Deliver us the moon review ign3/27/2023 ![]() ![]() They base it on franchise popularity first.Īnimations freezing when you do something like climb a ladder If a game like this with all the bad pop ins, frame rate issues, missing content, shallow areas and the like can still get a good score then other games that usually fly under the radar don't have a good chance. The sad thing is Digimon will be swept under the rug like it usually is because it seems most reviews don't care even when the developers pour more effort into the newest instalment But seriously, it's ok to criticize something from Nitntendo, and not everyone criticizing is a hater.Īnd did you really just use the, "something is something.Not" line? really? You really are a nostalgia buff. Game will still sell tons, and I'm not going on a anti-Pokemon tirade in all the reviews. Not disputing the score by IGN, but haters had plenty to say beyond expecting W3 graphics. It's nothing but a casual game now, and how that can be praised as something amazing is beyond me. This game apparently reduces the addictiveness of the game play, removes options to keep it addictive or allow people to play certain ways, has piss poor animations, removes a significant number of pokemon to the point of having ridiculously few relative to past game, and doesn't let you build your pokemon individually. It's simple, casual game play, with some post game stuff that was less casual and kept people engaged. It's an addictive game, which does what it does well, which is keep you playing to build your collection of Pokemon, while training said collection to be better. Pokemon has never been a cutting edge series in terms of graphics, animations, or even game play design. Even GameCube games had better animations. ![]() Certainly the world is more shiny, but the animations are barely suitable for the PS1 era. Giving this game a 9.3 is an absolute joke.Īll of this, plus the fact they still do the EXTREMELY scummy practice of releasing 2 different versions, of THE SAME GAME, just they each have pokemon exclusive to them, as well as Gyms, SERIOUSLY HOW IS NITNENDO STILL NOT GETTING CALLED OUT ON THIS IN 2019?! They literally must have most media paid off, they can't all actually be this biased.įrom what I've watched, I wouldn't say anything looked amazing. The pokemon series has grown so stagnant it's sad. THIS IS THE TOP GROSSING FRANCHISE OF ALL TIME, with the games being a MAJOR backbone to that franchise, if you can honestly tell me that these games look like the quality that they sell, you're lying to yourself, you have parts of the game LITERALLY looking like an N64 game, you have models and animations ripped STRAIGHT from the 3DS games (Besides the new pokemon of course) Now you would think with more than half of ALL pokemon cut, you would see IMPROVEMENTS, but where are they? Clearly not to the world, not to the pokemon, not to the animations, not to the "story" so where did all of the millions upon millions of dollars get spent? Where is the justification for this being a $60 game? Games released annually have more improvements than this. At this point one of my favorite series of all time is going to remain below average forever. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |